Platforms for email nurture, lead scoring, and campaign orchestration. Right now, HubSpot is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 93 and the #1 spot in 72% of answers. Head-to-head: HubSpot vs ActiveCampaign →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
HubSpot dominates; everyone else is competing for bronze.
HubSpot's 92.5 score leaves ActiveCampaign, the closest competitor, 36 points behind, and no other brand lands a first pick more than 10% of the time. The gap is consistent across all three models, meaning this is not a quirk of one AI's training data. Below HubSpot, the remaining four brands cluster tightly between 28 and 57, essentially trading footnote status with each other.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±2.8 | flat | 99% | 1.6 | 72% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±4.7 | flat | 79% | 3.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #2 Gemini #2 |
| 3 | Marketo | ±1.9 | ▲ 5 | 63% | 2.9 | 7% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #3 Gemini #5 |
| 4 | | ±4.8 | flat | 58% | 3.9 | 4% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #5 Gemini #3 |
| 5 | | ±5.1 | flat | 40% | 2.9 | 6% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #6 Gemini #4 |
| 6 | | ±4.8 | flat | 40% | 4.0 | 10% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #4 Gemini #12 |
| 7 | | ±4.5 | flat | 28% | 4.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #8 Gemini #8 |
| 8 | | ±4.9 | flat | 21% | 3.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #7 Gemini #13 |
| 9 | | ±3.8 | ▼ 9 | 22% | 5.7 | 1% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #11 Gemini #6 |
| 10 | | ±3 | flat | 17% | 4.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #10 Gemini #9 |
| 11 | | ±3.3 | flat | 14% | 4.7 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude #9 Gemini #10 |
| 12 | | ±3.1 | flat | 17% | 6.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude Gemini #14 |
| 13 | | ±2.6 | flat | 10% | 5.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude Gemini #7 |
| 14 | | ±3.5 | ▼ 5 | 6% | 3.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude Gemini #15 |
| 15 | | ±3.5 | flat | 6% | 3.5 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude Gemini #11 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Iterable (3.5), Pipedrive (3.5), Ortto (2.8), Adobe (2.5), Eloqua (1.9). 64 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 8/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Marketing Automation head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Marketing Automation: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.