Platforms for alerting, on-call rotations, incident response, and postmortems. Right now, PagerDuty is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 83 and the #1 spot in 65% of answers. Head-to-head: PagerDuty vs Opsgenie →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Opsgenie is everywhere but never the answer.
PagerDuty is the clear anchor, appearing in 92% of answers and winning first pick 65% of the time, no other brand comes close to that combination. Opsgenie sits in an odd spot: mentioned in 81% of answers but chosen first only 1% of the time, meaning the models treat it as a credible option they never actually recommend. Incident.io is the only brand that converts meaningful mention share into first-pick share, suggesting it has a real positioning wedge rather than just category familiarity.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±3.1 | flat | 92% | 2.0 | 65% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±6.4 | flat | 81% | 3.0 | 1% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #2 Gemini #3 |
| 3 | | ±5.3 | flat | 72% | 3.5 | 17% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #4 Gemini #2 |
| 4 | | ±3.7 | ▲ 6 | 57% | 4.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #5 Gemini #6 |
| 5 | | ±5.1 | flat | 44% | 4.1 | 3% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #3 Gemini #5 |
| 6 | | ±4.9 | flat | 50% | 5.1 | 3% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #6 Gemini #7 |
| 7 | | ±4.7 | flat | 28% | 3.9 | 10% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #8 Gemini #4 |
| 8 | | ±3.1 | flat | 18% | 4.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #10 Gemini #8 |
| 9 | | ±4.5 | ▲ 9 | 15% | 3.5 | 0% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #11 Gemini |
| 10 | | ±4 | flat | 17% | 4.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #13 Gemini |
| 11 | | ±3.7 | flat | 15% | 5.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #12 Gemini #10 |
| 12 | | ±2.2 | flat | 11% | 3.8 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude #7 Gemini |
| 13 | | ±3.4 | flat | 14% | 6.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #14 Gemini #9 |
| 14 | | ±4.5 | flat | 13% | 6.0 | 1% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #9 Gemini #11 |
| 15 | | ±3.5 | flat | 8% | 6.0 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #15 Gemini |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Better Uptime (4.2), Spike.sh (3.8), Alertmanager (3.2), Splunk (2.9), GoAlert (2.6). 56 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 17/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Incident Management & On-Call head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Incident Management & On-Call: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.