Behavior analytics tools for session recordings, heatmaps, and UX insights. Right now, Hotjar is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 71 and the #1 spot in 26% of answers. Head-to-head: Hotjar vs Microsoft Clarity →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Hotjar and Clarity trade punches while the field watches.
Six points separate the top two, but they pull that gap over FullStory and everyone below, making this a genuine two-brand contest for AI mindshare. Clarity actually wins the first-pick battle at 33% versus Hotjar's 26%, which matters because being named first in an AI answer shapes buyer perception the most. FullStory sits a distant third at a score of 47.6, and LogRocket draws zero first picks across all 72 answers, signaling it has nearly vanished from AI-generated shortlists.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±2.7 | flat | 82% | 2.3 | 26% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #2 |
| 2 | | ±3.8 | flat | 78% | 2.6 | 33% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #2 Gemini #1 |
| 3 | | ±4 | flat | 61% | 3.2 | 7% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #3 Gemini #3 |
| 4 | | ±6 | flat | 50% | 3.2 | 10% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #5 Gemini #4 |
| 5 | | ±4.6 | flat | 39% | 4.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #4 Gemini #6 |
| 6 | | ±4 | flat | 33% | 3.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #8 Gemini #5 |
| 7 | | ±3.4 | flat | 21% | 2.4 | 10% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #11 Gemini #7 |
| 8 | | ±4.1 | flat | 19% | 2.6 | 6% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #9 Gemini #8 |
| 9 | | ±4.3 | flat | 24% | 4.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #7 Gemini #9 |
| 10 | | ±4.3 | flat | 21% | 4.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #6 Gemini #11 |
| 11 | | ±4.1 | ▲ 7 | 21% | 5.1 | 1% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #15 Gemini #10 |
| 12 | | ±2.9 | ▼ 6 | 13% | 4.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #13 Gemini #12 |
| 13 | | ±2.5 | flat | 7% | 1.6 | 3% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #10 Gemini |
| 14 | | ±1.9 | flat | 7% | 2.6 | 1% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #12 Gemini |
| 15 | | ±1.7 | ▼ 3 | 7% | 4.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #15 Claude #14 Gemini |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: VWO (4.6), Pendo (4.2), Crazy Egg (4.2), Securonix (3.5), IBM QRadar (3.2). 37 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 29/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Session Replay & Heatmaps head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Session Replay & Heatmaps: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.