Meeting and video collaboration platforms for teams. Right now, Zoom is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 83 and the #1 spot in 54% of answers. Head-to-head: Zoom vs Microsoft Teams →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Zoom leads but Microsoft Teams is right on its heels.
Zoom tops the index at 82.9 but Microsoft Teams sits just 6 points back, and both clear 86% mention rates, meaning AI models treat them as near-interchangeable starting points for most buyer questions. Google Meet earns mentions in 82% of answers yet wins the first-pick position only 13% of the time, suggesting it reads as a credible option rather than a preferred one. Webex and Logitech trail far behind, with Webex appearing in 40% of answers but almost never earning the top recommendation.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±0.8 | flat | 88% | 1.5 | 54% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±1.9 | flat | 86% | 2.0 | 21% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #2 Gemini #2 |
| 3 | | ±2 | flat | 82% | 2.7 | 13% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #3 Gemini #3 |
| 4 | | ±4.3 | flat | 40% | 3.8 | 1% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #4 Gemini #4 |
| 5 | | ±0.5 | flat | 13% | 1.2 | 11% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #5 Gemini #5 |
| 6 | | ±0.4 | ▼ 1 | 15% | 4.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #7 Gemini #6 |
| 7 | | ±2.1 | flat | 11% | 2.5 | 0% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #11 Gemini #7 |
| 8 | | ±1.9 | flat | 10% | 2.7 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #6 Gemini #13 |
| 9 | | ±2.4 | flat | 13% | 4.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #9 Gemini #15 |
| 10 | | ±1.1 | ▼ 2 | 10% | 4.9 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude #8 Gemini #8 |
| 11 | | ±2.7 | flat | 8% | 4.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #12 Gemini #14 |
| 12 | | ±1.5 | flat | 10% | 5.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #10 Gemini #12 |
| 13 | | ±2.5 | ▲ 4 | 8% | 4.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #14 Gemini #9 |
| 14 | | ±0.9 | ▼ 3 | 8% | 5.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude Gemini #10 |
| 15 | | ±1.9 | flat | 6% | 4.0 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude #13 Gemini #11 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: GoTo Meeting (3.3), Whereby (3.2), Riverside.fm (3.1), Otter (2.9), Apple FaceTime (2.9). 46 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 17/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Video Conferencing head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Video Conferencing: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.