Meeting and video collaboration platforms for teams. Right now, Zoom is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 84 and the #1 spot in 56% of answers. Head-to-head: Zoom vs Microsoft Teams →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Zoom owns the room; everyone else fights for scraps.
Zoom appears in 89% of answers and gets picked first 56% of the time, making it the reflexive AI answer for video conferencing buyers. Microsoft Teams and Google Meet hover in the 80% mention range but rarely land the top slot, suggesting AI models treat them as credible alternatives rather than default recommendations. Webex and Logitech are barely in the conversation, with Webex never earning a first pick across all 72 answers.
AI-generated analysis of the July 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±1.7 | 89% | 2 | 56% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±1.8 | 86% | 2 | 18% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #2 Gemini #2 |
| 3 | | ±3.2 | 81% | 3 | 13% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #3 Gemini #3 |
| 4 | | ±1.7 | 36% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #4 Gemini #4 |
| 5 | | ±0.3 | 13% | 1 | 11% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #5 Gemini #5 |
| 6 | | ±1.9 | 17% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #8 Gemini #6 |
| 7 | | ±0.7 | 13% | 3 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #7 Gemini #8 |
| 8 | | ±1.9 | 15% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #11 Gemini #15 |
| 9 | | ±2.5 | 10% | 2 | 1% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #6 Gemini #14 |
| 10 | | ±0.5 | 13% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #9 Gemini #9 |
| 11 | | ±2.7 | 13% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #12 Gemini #7 |
| 12 | | ±2.6 | 8% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #15 Claude #10 Gemini #11 |
| 13 | | ±3.8 | 8% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #14 Gemini #12 |
| 14 | | ±2.2 | 10% | 6 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #13 Gemini #13 |
| 15 | | ±1.9 | 7% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude Gemini #10 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Riverside.fm (4.7), Owl Labs (3.5), ON24 (2.9), Apple FaceTime (2.9), Loom (2.5). 41 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 16/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Video Conferencing head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Video Conferencing: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.3-chat-latest
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in July 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.