Financial planning and analysis platforms for budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. Right now, Mosaic is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 57 and the #1 spot in 28% of answers. Head-to-head: Mosaic vs Anaplan →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Mosaic leads but no brand owns all three models.
Mosaic sits at the top with a 57 overall score and appears in 78% of answers, yet Claude is responsible for much of that lift while ChatGPT barely notices it. Anaplan runs the opposite pattern, scoring 63 on ChatGPT but only 38 on Gemini, meaning model choice alone can flip which vendor looks dominant. Cube's quirk is worth flagging: it gets mentioned in 68% of answers but converts to a first pick just 4% of the time, suggesting AI models treat it as a safe supporting mention rather than a real recommendation.
AI-generated analysis of the July 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±4.1 | 78% | 4 | 28% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #1 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±3.4 | 65% | 3 | 26% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #2 Gemini #4 |
| 3 | | ±6 | 64% | 4 | 13% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #6 Gemini #2 |
| 4 | | ±5.1 | 68% | 5 | 4% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #3 Gemini #3 |
| 5 | | ±5.1 | 36% | 4 | 3% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #8 Gemini #5 |
| 6 | | ±4.7 | 40% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #4 Gemini #11 |
| 7 | | ±4.3 | 29% | 4 | 11% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #5 Gemini #13 |
| 8 | | ±5.6 | 25% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #11 Gemini #8 |
| 9 | | ±1.2 | 24% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #7 Gemini #12 |
| 10 | | ±5.1 | 21% | 4 | 3% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #10 Gemini #10 |
| 11 | | ±4 | 25% | 6 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #14 Gemini #7 |
| 12 | | ±4.2 | 19% | 4 | 4% | ChatGPT Claude #12 Gemini #6 |
| 13 | | ±3.7 | 17% | 5 | 1% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #9 Gemini #14 |
| 14 | | ±3.8 | 15% | 4 | 1% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #13 Gemini #15 |
| 15 | | ±2.6 | 15% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude Gemini #9 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Vena (9.2), Vareto (8.1), Drivetrain (7.1), Google Sheets (6.1), Oracle EPM Cloud (6). 66 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 43/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in FP&A & Financial Planning head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in FP&A & Financial Planning: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.3-chat-latest
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in July 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.