Electronic signature and contract lifecycle management software. Right now, DocuSign is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 73 and the #1 spot in 64% of answers. Head-to-head: DocuSign vs PandaDoc →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
DocuSign leads, but PandaDoc is breathing down its neck.
DocuSign converts its mentions into first picks at a 64% rate, which is where its real advantage sits, but PandaDoc appears in 88% of answers, the highest mention rate in the category, keeping the gap between their overall scores to just 4 points. Gemini is the one model where PandaDoc actually pulls ahead of DocuSign, which means the category leader has a platform-specific blind spot worth watching. Dropbox Sign and Adobe Acrobat Sign cluster tightly in the mid-50s but almost never get the first pick, so their presence is more about being named than being chosen.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±2.7 | flat | 76% | 1.5 | 64% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #2 |
| 2 | | ±3.4 | flat | 88% | 3.1 | 21% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #2 Gemini #1 |
| 3 | | ±3.1 | flat | 72% | 3.3 | 4% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #4 Gemini #4 |
| 4 | Adobe Acrobat Sign | ±3.5 | flat | 69% | 3.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #3 Gemini #3 |
| 5 | | ±6.2 | flat | 50% | 4.1 | 3% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #5 Gemini #5 |
| 6 | | ±5.3 | flat | 25% | 4.3 | 4% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #9 Gemini #8 |
| 7 | | ±2.6 | flat | 25% | 4.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #6 Gemini #7 |
| 8 | Zoho Sign | ±3.7 | flat | 28% | 5.5 | 0% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #11 Gemini #6 |
| 9 | | ±2.1 | flat | 13% | 3.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #8 Gemini #12 |
| 10 | | ±2.8 | flat | 18% | 6.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #10 Gemini #13 |
| 11 | | ±2.5 | flat | 11% | 4.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude Gemini #9 |
| 12 | | ±2 | flat | 8% | 4.2 | 3% | ChatGPT Claude #7 Gemini |
| 13 | | ±2.8 | flat | 8% | 4.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #14 Gemini #14 |
| 14 | | ±2.1 | flat | 7% | 3.2 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude #12 Gemini #10 |
| 15 | | ±2.4 | flat | 10% | 5.7 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #13 Gemini #11 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: OneSpan Sign (4.6), Better Proposals (4.2), OneSpan (4), Signaturely (3.9), Conga (3.9). 58 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 28/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in E-signature & Contracts head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in E-signature & Contracts: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.