Professional services automation platforms for consultancies covering projects, resourcing, time, and billing. Right now, Kantata is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 57 and the #1 spot in 25% of answers. Head-to-head: Kantata vs Certinia →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Kantata leads, but three rivals are close enough to matter.
Kantata's 56.7 score sits 19 points clear of Certinia, which sounds comfortable until you notice BigTime, Scoro, and Accelo are all within 17 points of second place, making the pack behind genuinely contested. Kantata's Claude score of 38.3 is its weakest model by far, leaving real room for competitors to chip away if they strengthen their presence in that one engine. Scoro's Claude score of 2.1 is essentially invisible there, which keeps its overall number artificially low and suggests model-specific gaps matter as much as aggregate rank in this category.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (2 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±4.1 | flat | 65% | 2.3 | 25% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±7 | flat | 42% | 2.1 | 22% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #3 Gemini #2 |
| 3 | | ±5.7 | flat | 43% | 4.8 | 1% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #7 Gemini #7 |
| 4 | | ±5.4 | flat | 36% | 4.2 | 10% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #11 Gemini #3 |
| 5 | | ±4.9 | ▼ 8 | 39% | 5.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #14 Gemini #8 |
| 6 | | ±5.1 | flat | 38% | 5.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #9 Gemini #4 |
| 7 | | ±2.2 | flat | 31% | 4.6 | 3% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #6 Gemini #5 |
| 8 | | ±4.4 | flat | 21% | 4.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #4 Gemini #10 |
| 9 | | ±6.3 | flat | 22% | 4.8 | 4% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #2 Gemini #14 |
| 10 | | ±4.9 | flat | 15% | 4.1 | 1% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #8 Gemini #11 |
| 11 | NetSuite OpenAir | ±3.5 | flat | 19% | 5.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #6 Claude Gemini #12 |
| 12 | | ±3.9 | flat | 15% | 4.9 | 1% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #12 Gemini #6 |
| 13 | | ±3.4 | flat | 10% | 2.7 | 4% | ChatGPT Claude #5 Gemini |
| 14 | | ±4.4 | flat | 17% | 6.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #13 Gemini #13 |
| 15 | | ±2.5 | flat | 10% | 4.4 | 3% | ChatGPT Claude #10 Gemini #9 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: ConnectWise (6), Bonsai (5.7), Microsoft Entra ID (5.6), Oracle NetSuite (5.1), ConnectWise Manage (5.1). 110 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 43/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Consulting & Professional Services Automation head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Consulting & Professional Services Automation: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.