Management software for catering companies covering proposals, events, menus, and invoicing. Right now, Total Party Planner is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 66 and the #1 spot in 19% of answers. Head-to-head: Total Party Planner vs Caterease →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Catering AI visibility is a two-brand fight with nothing close behind.
Total Party Planner and Caterease sit within 7 points of each other at the top, while the next brand trails by 16 points, making the rest of the field a secondary conversation. The rivalry has an interesting wrinkle: Caterease wins first-pick honors at 28% versus Total Party Planner's 19%, suggesting Claude in particular drives strong preference for Caterease with a score of 85. Tripleseat is the only credible third voice, but its 43 overall score and near-zero Claude presence keep it from threatening the lead pair.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±4.6 | 74% | 2.1 | 19% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #2 Gemini #2 |
| 2 | | ±6.3 | 65% | 2.0 | 28% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #1 Gemini #3 |
| 3 | | ±5.4 | 54% | 3.1 | 19% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #7 Gemini #1 |
| 4 | | ±5.5 | 54% | 3.8 | 7% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #3 Gemini #4 |
| 5 | Curate | ±7.5 | 43% | 3.5 | 8% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #5 Gemini #7 |
| 6 | | ±7.4 | 39% | 3.5 | 3% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #4 Gemini #6 |
| 7 | | ±5.5 | 24% | 4.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #12 Gemini #5 |
| 8 | | ±5.2 | 19% | 3.4 | 3% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #14 Gemini #11 |
| 9 | | ±4.4 | 17% | 5.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #6 Gemini #14 |
| 10 | | ±2.6 | 11% | 5.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #10 Gemini #9 |
| 11 | | ±2.5 | 8% | 4.2 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude #13 Gemini #8 |
| 12 | | ±2.6 | 7% | 3.0 | 1% | ChatGPT Claude #9 Gemini #12 |
| 13 | | ±3.6 | 8% | 4.5 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude Gemini #13 |
| 14 | | ±2.7 | 6% | 1.8 | 1% | ChatGPT Claude #11 Gemini #10 |
| 15 | | ±3.2 | 8% | 5.0 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #8 Gemini #15 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Microsoft Entra ID (4.4), Microsoft Azure (4.2), Square (3.8), Better Catering (3.5), 17hats (3.1). 64 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 34/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Catering Management head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Catering Management: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.