FoodStorm: AI Visibility Report
When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about catering management, FoodStorm ranks #7 of 15, a Visibility Score of 16 in Catering Management .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
One category, one race, stuck in the back half.
Where it wins. FoodStorm earns a 24% mention rate in Catering Management, which at least keeps it in active rotation when AI models field buying questions on that topic. Its strongest foothold is the 'Top tools in 2026' prompt theme, meaning it surfaces when buyers ask broad inventory-style questions.
Where it loses. Rank 7 of 15 with zero first-pick selections tells the real story: AI models place FoodStorm behind Total Party Planner, Tripleseat, and Caterease when it matters most, and it drops out entirely when prompts turn to enterprise buyers or feature-specific needs.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
ChatGPT 
Claude 
Gemini One of the index's bigger model splits: see where the models disagree →
Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention FoodStorm. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Enterprise pick · Feature-led ask
Share of FoodStorm's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Catering Management: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.