Caterease: AI Visibility Report
When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about catering management, Caterease ranks #2 of 15, a Visibility Score of 59 in Catering Management .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Catering Management's clear second, nowhere else.
Where it wins. A 65% mention rate in Catering Management puts Caterease in nearly every AI-generated shortlist for that category, and a rank of 2 out of 15 means it consistently finishes ahead of most named competitors.
Where it loses. With only 28% of first-pick selections, buyers see Caterease as a strong alternative rather than the default answer, and its complete absence from enterprise-framed prompts means larger catering operations are likely routed toward other names before Caterease surfaces.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
ChatGPT 
Claude 
Gemini One of the index's bigger model splits: see where the models disagree →
Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention Caterease. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Enterprise pick
Share of Caterease's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Head-to-head: Caterease vs Total Party Planner
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Catering Management: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.