Platforms for buying, renewing, and managing SaaS spend. Right now, Zylo is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 74 and the #1 spot in 32% of answers. Head-to-head: Zylo vs Vendr →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Zylo leads clearly, but Vendr and Torii keep it honest.
Zylo is the nearest thing to a default answer here, appearing in 96% of responses and holding a double-digit score gap over everyone else. Vendr is the only real challenger on first-pick rate at 31%, though Torii quietly outscores it on Claude. Zluri is the oddest case in the set: Claude rates it at 73 while ChatGPT and Gemini sit below 20, a model-disagreement gap that wide usually signals a brand with a narrow but vocal presence in certain training data.
AI-generated analysis of the July 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±5.9 | 96% | 3 | 32% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #3 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±5.6 | 81% | 3 | 31% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #4 Gemini #2 |
| 3 | | ±5.3 | 83% | 4 | 7% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #1 Gemini #3 |
| 4 | | ±6.3 | 49% | 4 | 6% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #2 Gemini #9 |
| 5 | | ±7.3 | 53% | 5 | 1% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #5 Gemini #5 |
| 6 | | ±4.6 | 39% | 4 | 1% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #12 Gemini #4 |
| 7 | | ±5.2 | 42% | 6 | 8% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #13 Gemini #7 |
| 8 | | ±5.6 | 36% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #6 Gemini #8 |
| 9 | | ±4.9 | 22% | 5 | 6% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #9 Gemini #11 |
| 10 | | ±4 | 32% | 7 | 0% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #14 Gemini #10 |
| 11 | | ±3.7 | 22% | 6 | 6% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #7 Gemini |
| 12 | | ±4.9 | 26% | 7 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #10 Gemini #12 |
| 13 | | ±2.9 | 22% | 7 | 0% | ChatGPT #15 Claude #15 Gemini #6 |
| 14 | | ±2.9 | 19% | 6 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #8 Gemini |
| 15 | | ±3.6 | 15% | 7 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #11 Gemini #13 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: SAP Ariba (6.1), Google Workspace (3.9), Cleanshelf (3.9), Sastrify (3.5), Jaggaer (3.3). 64 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 26/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in SaaS Procurement & Spend head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in SaaS Procurement & Spend: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.3-chat-latest
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in July 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.