Sanity: AI Visibility Report
When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about website builders, Sanity ranks #8 of 15, a Visibility Score of 13 in Website Builders .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
One category, one mid-table slot, no clear breakout.
Where it wins. Sanity holds a spot in Website Builders conversations, appearing in 15% of relevant AI recommendations, which keeps it inside the consideration set alongside Contentful and Webflow.
Where it loses. A rank of 8 out of 15 and a first-pick rate of only 5.6% signal that AI models reach for Sanity as a list-filler rather than a lead recommendation, and it registers across none of the six prompt themes that reflect how buyers actually frame a purchase decision.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
"The back-end built for AI content operations"
Homepage self-messaging · September 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →
ChatGPT 
Claude 
Gemini Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention Sanity. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Best overall · Use-case fit · Top tools in 2026 · Startup & small team · If you could pick one · Budget & alternatives
Share of Sanity's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Website Builders: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.