← Freelance & Talent Marketplaces ranking
Brand report · September 2026When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about freelance & talent marketplaces, PeoplePerHour ranks #9 of 15, a Visibility Score of 14 in Freelance & Talent Marketplaces .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Ninth in one race, and that race is the whole game.
Where it wins. A 23.6% mention rate keeps PeoplePerHour in the conversation for budget-focused freelance searches, where co-mentions alongside Toptal and Upwork at least confirm it registers as a legitimate tier-two option.
Where it loses. Zero first-pick selections means buyers hear the name but route their spend elsewhere, and the platform is completely invisible when AI models field questions about use-case fit, enterprise needs, or feature-specific criteria.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
PeoplePerHour claims Freelance & Talent Marketplaces and the models back it: #10 of 15 there.
Homepage self-messaging · September 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →
Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention PeoplePerHour. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Use-case fit · Enterprise pick · Feature-led ask
Share of PeoplePerHour's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Freelance & Talent Marketplaces: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.