Umami: AI Visibility Report
When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about product analytics, Umami ranks #12 of 15, a Visibility Score of 8 in Product Analytics .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Umami is stuck at the bottom of one very crowded race.
Where it wins. Its only foothold is product analytics, where co-mentions alongside PostHog and Plausible confirm the models know it exists. The 11% mention rate keeps it technically on the board in that field.
Where it loses. Ranking 12th of 15 with zero first-pick selections, Umami gets dropped into price-and-alternatives conversations and nowhere else, meaning buyers who ask about best-fit tools, top picks, or enterprise needs never hear its name.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
ChatGPT 
Claude 
Gemini Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention Umami. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Best overall · Use-case fit · Top tools in 2026 · Startup & small team · Enterprise pick · Feature-led ask · If you could pick one
Share of Umami's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Product Analytics: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.