June.so: AI Visibility Report
When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about product analytics, June.so ranks #10 of 15, a Visibility Score of 10 in Product Analytics .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
One category, bottom third, and buyers never hear its name first.
Where it wins. June.so at least surfaces in 15% of product analytics conversations, keeping it inside a crowded 15-tool field rather than invisible entirely.
Where it loses. A 0% first-pick rate alongside absence from use-case, enterprise, and feature-driven prompts means the AIs reach for PostHog, Mixpanel, or Amplitude before June.so enters the picture, limiting its mentions to budget and comparison threads where switching intent is already high.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
June.so claims Product Analytics and the models back it: #12 of 15 there.
"Auto-generated reports for customer analysis focused on how companies use your product"
Homepage self-messaging · September 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →
Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention June.so. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Use-case fit · Enterprise pick · Feature-led ask · If you could pick one
Share of June.so's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Product Analytics: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini