Keyword rank tracking tools: monitor search positions across markets and devices over time. Right now, AccuRanker is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 58 and the #1 spot in 3% of answers. Head-to-head: AccuRanker vs Semrush →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
AccuRanker leads on reach, Semrush leads when it counts most.
AccuRanker gets mentioned in 74% of answers and holds the top overall score, but Semrush wins the first-pick battle at 28% versus AccuRanker's 3%, meaning Semrush is the brand AI models actually recommend when forced to choose one. Claude is driving that dynamic almost entirely, giving Semrush a 78 score while barely acknowledging SE Ranking at 24. Ahrefs and SE Ranking sit close together in the middle tier, but Ahrefs collapses on Gemini to 27 while SE Ranking holds 53 there, suggesting real model-specific blind spots that buyers should factor into their AI-channel assumptions.
AI-generated analysis of the July 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±3.6 | 74% | 3 | 3% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #3 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±5.3 | 65% | 2 | 28% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #1 Gemini #3 |
| 3 | | ±5.3 | 58% | 3 | 14% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #2 Gemini #6 |
| 4 | | ±6.4 | 56% | 3 | 21% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #7 Gemini #2 |
| 5 | | ±4.8 | 53% | 5 | 1% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #6 Gemini #4 |
| 6 | | ±4.1 | 31% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #10 Gemini #5 |
| 7 | | ±4.7 | 31% | 4 | 3% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #5 Gemini #12 |
| 8 | | ±3.2 | 25% | 5 | 4% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #9 Gemini #7 |
| 9 | | ±1.7 | 18% | 4 | 4% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #12 Gemini #10 |
| 10 | | ±2.6 | 17% | 4 | 3% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #13 Gemini #11 |
| 11 | | ±3.3 | 24% | 6 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #8 Gemini #9 |
| 12 | | ±6.2 | 15% | 3 | 3% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #4 Gemini |
| 13 | | ±2.7 | 15% | 4 | 3% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #11 Gemini #13 |
| 14 | | ±4.4 | 11% | 2 | 6% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #14 Gemini #14 |
| 15 | | ±2.9 | 11% | 4 | 1% | ChatGPT Claude #15 Gemini #8 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Moz Pro (7.1), DataForSEO (6.8), SerpApi (6.1), Ubersuggest (5), seoClarity (4.6). 48 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 42/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Rank Tracking head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Rank Tracking: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.3-chat-latest
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in July 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.