Keyword rank tracking tools: monitor search positions across markets and devices over time. Right now, AccuRanker is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 65 and the #1 spot in 8% of answers. Head-to-head: AccuRanker vs Semrush →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
AccuRanker and Semrush trade punches while the field watches.
The two leaders sit within 2 points of each other on overall score, but they win differently: AccuRanker shows up in 82% of answers yet gets first pick only 8% of the time, while Semrush leads first-pick mentions at 40% despite lower mention breadth. The model split sharpens the story further, with Claude heavily favoring Semrush at 80.4 versus AccuRanker's 58.3, making the race look different depending on which AI your buyer uses. Ahrefs and SE Ranking both clear 50% mention rates but sit roughly 20 points behind on score, confirming the top two have pulled meaningfully ahead.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±3.6 | ▲ 11 | 82% | 3.1 | 8% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #2 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±4.9 | flat | 71% | 2.1 | 40% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #1 Gemini #4 |
| 3 | | ±6.4 | flat | 57% | 3.2 | 1% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #3 Gemini #5 |
| 4 | | ±4.5 | flat | 56% | 3.4 | 19% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #9 Gemini #2 |
| 5 | | ±5.2 | flat | 47% | 4.5 | 1% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #5 Gemini #3 |
| 6 | | ±5.5 | flat | 33% | 4.6 | 4% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #13 Gemini #6 |
| 7 | | ±6.7 | flat | 32% | 4.7 | 1% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #6 Gemini #9 |
| 8 | | ±4 | flat | 28% | 4.2 | 6% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #10 Gemini #7 |
| 9 | | ±3 | flat | 18% | 3.0 | 1% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #7 Gemini #10 |
| 10 | | ±0.7 | flat | 18% | 4.3 | 4% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #11 Gemini #11 |
| 11 | | ±5.3 | flat | 13% | 3.0 | 3% | ChatGPT Claude #4 Gemini |
| 12 | | ±2.3 | flat | 13% | 3.6 | 1% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #14 Gemini #12 |
| 13 | | ±3.5 | flat | 13% | 3.9 | 3% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #15 Gemini #8 |
| 14 | | ±3.2 | flat | 19% | 6.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #8 Gemini #14 |
| 15 | | ±2.2 | flat | 11% | 3.9 | 3% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #12 Gemini #13 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: seoClarity (6.3), Moz Pro (5.3), DataForSEO (5.1), Advanced Web Ranking (4.2), Rank Ranger (3.5). 37 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 35/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Rank Tracking head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Rank Tracking: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.