Donor management and fundraising software for nonprofits covering gifts, campaigns, and donor relationships. Right now, Bloomerang is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 76 and the #1 spot in 46% of answers. Head-to-head: Bloomerang vs Little Green Light →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Bloomerang dominates; nobody else is even close.
Bloomerang is the runaway recommendation in nonprofit CRM, appearing in 85% of answers and landing the first pick nearly half the time, numbers that dwarf every competitor in the set. The remaining four brands cluster between scores of 26 and 47, close enough to each other that second place barely matters. The one wrinkle worth watching: Givebutter scores 71 on Gemini alone against single-digit showings on ChatGPT and Claude, suggesting it has a narrow foothold that depends entirely on one model's preferences.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (2 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±2.3 | flat | 85% | 2.0 | 46% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #2 |
| 2 | | ±2.9 | ▲ 4 | 57% | 2.8 | 7% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #2 Gemini #3 |
| 3 | | ±4.2 | flat | 44% | 3.3 | 14% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #6 Gemini #1 |
| 4 | | ±5.5 | flat | 47% | 3.8 | 7% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #3 Gemini #5 |
| 5 | | ±6.5 | flat | 36% | 3.8 | 6% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #4 Gemini #10 |
| 6 | | ±5.3 | flat | 35% | 4.7 | 0% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #8 Gemini #9 |
| 7 | | ±4.2 | flat | 24% | 3.7 | 1% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #5 Gemini #13 |
| 8 | | ±4.8 | flat | 21% | 3.3 | 4% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #13 Gemini #4 |
| 9 | | ±4.9 | flat | 29% | 5.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #7 Gemini #7 |
| 10 | | ±3.7 | flat | 18% | 3.5 | 3% | ChatGPT #15 Claude #10 Gemini #6 |
| 11 | | ±2.7 | flat | 19% | 5.4 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #11 Gemini #8 |
| 12 | | ±4.7 | flat | 17% | 5.7 | 0% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #9 Gemini #12 |
| 13 | | ±3.8 | flat | 13% | 4.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #14 Gemini |
| 14 | | ±4.8 | flat | 13% | 5.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #12 Gemini #11 |
| 15 | | ±3.5 | flat | 11% | 4.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #15 Gemini |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Microsoft Entra ID (6), Okta (4.4), Microsoft Azure (4.2), Network for Good (3.8), AWS (3.8). 63 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 24/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Nonprofit Fundraising & CRM head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Nonprofit Fundraising & CRM: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.