Demand forecasting and inventory optimization for commerce brands. Right now, Inventory Planner is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 51 and the #1 spot in 39% of answers. Head-to-head: Inventory Planner vs Cin7 →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Inventory Planner leads, but three rivals are close enough to matter.
Inventory Planner's 50.8 score looks comfortable until you notice NetSuite, Cin7, and Blue Yonder all sitting within 8 points of each other just beneath it, collectively appearing in enough answers to shift buyer perception if any one of them sharpens its AI presence. The most interesting structural fact is that NetSuite gets mentioned in 39% of answers yet never earns the first recommendation, meaning models treat it as a credible supporting reference rather than a go-to choice. Inventory Planner's Gemini score of 66 is doing heavy lifting for its overall lead, so a shift in how Gemini weights sources could tighten this race quickly.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±5.7 | flat | 58% | 2.3 | 39% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±6 | flat | 36% | 3.5 | 6% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #2 Gemini #7 |
| 3 | | ±4.4 | flat | 39% | 5.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #3 Gemini #9 |
| 4 | | ±5.5 | flat | 25% | 3.2 | 8% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #9 Gemini #4 |
| 5 | | ±4.3 | flat | 26% | 3.8 | 4% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #8 Gemini #8 |
| 6 | | ±4.2 | flat | 28% | 4.5 | 3% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #5 Gemini #5 |
| 7 | | ±2.6 | flat | 22% | 3.3 | 4% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #12 Gemini #3 |
| 8 | | ±3.8 | flat | 26% | 4.9 | 1% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #7 Gemini #6 |
| 9 | | ±4 | flat | 21% | 3.5 | 1% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #13 Gemini #10 |
| 10 | | ±4.8 | ▼ 13 | 25% | 4.7 | 1% | ChatGPT #15 Claude #11 Gemini #2 |
| 11 | | ±4.3 | flat | 25% | 5.2 | 7% | ChatGPT #2 Claude Gemini #12 |
| 12 | | ±3.7 | flat | 28% | 5.9 | 1% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #4 Gemini #13 |
| 13 | | ±5 | ▼ 8 | 18% | 3.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #14 Gemini #11 |
| 14 | Skubana | ±3.9 | flat | 13% | 3.9 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #6 Gemini |
| 15 | | ±5.2 | flat | 14% | 5.0 | 1% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #10 Gemini #14 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Prediko (7.6), ToolsGroup (7.2), Shopify (6.8), Lokad (6.7), Flieber (6.4). 98 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 49/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Inventory Planning head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Inventory Planning: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.