When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about inventory planning, Cogsy ranks #13 of 15, a Visibility Score of 13 in Inventory Planning .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Cogsy is fighting for scraps in a 15-team inventory planning race.
Where it wins. It earns a mention rate of 18% in Inventory Planning, meaning roughly one in five relevant conversations includes its name. That foothold, however thin, is the entire foundation of its AI presence.
Where it loses. Ranked 13th of 15 and pulling zero first-pick selections, Cogsy gets stacked behind Inventory Planner, Cin7, and Extensiv before a buyer ever considers it seriously. It is also missing from every high-intent prompt theme, including enterprise and feature-specific queries, where purchase decisions actually close.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
Cogsy claims Inventory Planning and the models back it: #11 of 15 there.
Homepage self-messaging · September 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →
Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention Cogsy. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Top tools in 2026 · Enterprise pick · Feature-led ask · If you could pick one
Share of Cogsy's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Inventory Planning: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.