Learning management and upskilling platforms for companies. Right now, Docebo is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 61 and the #1 spot in 19% of answers. Head-to-head: Docebo vs TalentLMS →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Two brands lead, but neither has locked up the category.
Docebo tops the index on overall score and mention rate at 76%, yet TalentLMS actually wins the first-pick contest at 39% versus Docebo's 19%, meaning the models reach for TalentLMS when they have to commit to a single recommendation. Cornerstone OnDemand sits at third place on paper but scores only 10 with Gemini, a fragility that could matter as that model's share of buyer queries grows. Absorb gets mentioned in 42% of answers but never lands first, which is the most useful definition of invisible.
AI-generated analysis of the July 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±5.1 | 76% | 3 | 19% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #1 Gemini #2 |
| 2 | | ±4.3 | 71% | 3 | 39% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #2 Gemini #1 |
| 3 | | ±4.8 | 38% | 3 | 17% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #3 Gemini #9 |
| 4 | | ±6.5 | 42% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #5 Gemini #4 |
| 5 | | ±5.9 | 38% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #14 Gemini #3 |
| 6 | | ±3.3 | 36% | 6 | 4% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #6 Gemini #11 |
| 7 | | ±3.3 | 28% | 5 | 6% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #4 Gemini #5 |
| 8 | | ±5.9 | 24% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #11 Gemini #7 |
| 9 | | ±5.4 | 28% | 6 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude #12 Gemini #8 |
| 10 | | ±2 | 19% | 4 | 3% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #13 Gemini #10 |
| 11 | | ±5.8 | 21% | 5 | 6% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #7 Gemini #12 |
| 12 | | ±3.9 | 18% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #4 Claude Gemini |
| 13 | | ±3.6 | 22% | 5 | 0% | ChatGPT #15 Claude #10 Gemini #6 |
| 14 | | ±2 | 18% | 4 | 0% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #8 Gemini |
| 15 | | ±4.3 | 14% | 3 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #9 Gemini #13 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: SAP SuccessFactors Learning (9.9), SAP Litmos (8.9), Trainual (8.9), LearnUpon (8.8), Coursera (8.8). 67 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 39/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Corporate Learning (LMS) head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Corporate Learning (LMS): the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.3-chat-latest
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in July 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.