Learning management and upskilling platforms for companies. Right now, Docebo is the brand AI assistants recommend most, with a Visibility Score of 59 and the #1 spot in 28% of answers. Head-to-head: Docebo vs TalentLMS →
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. When the models DO search the web, see which sources they cite. Methodology.
Docebo and TalentLMS are trading punches, nobody else close.
The Corporate Learning category is effectively a two-brand contest: Docebo leads with a score of 59 versus TalentLMS at 54, close enough that TalentLMS actually takes first-pick honors 31% of the time compared to Docebo's 28%. Absorb sits third in mention rate at 57% of answers but has never been anyone's top pick, which tells you the models treat it as a supporting reference rather than a genuine recommendation. Cornerstone OnDemand is the one outlier worth watching since Claude scores it on par with TalentLMS, suggesting model-to-model variation could shift rankings if Claude's influence grows.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
| # | Brand | Visibility Score | Trend (3 mo) | Mention rate | Avg. position | #1 pick rate | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | ±2.6 | flat | 71% | 2.6 | 28% | ChatGPT #1 Claude #2 Gemini #1 |
| 2 | | ±4 | flat | 67% | 3.0 | 31% | ChatGPT #3 Claude #3 Gemini #2 |
| 3 | | ±4.2 | flat | 58% | 2.3 | 22% | ChatGPT #2 Claude #1 Gemini #3 |
| 4 | | ±5.2 | ▲ 10 | 57% | 5.2 | 0% | ChatGPT #4 Claude #4 Gemini #6 |
| 5 | | ±5.9 | flat | 44% | 5.3 | 1% | ChatGPT #7 Claude #8 Gemini #5 |
| 6 | SAP SuccessFactors Learning | ±4.3 | flat | 35% | 3.8 | 0% | ChatGPT #6 Claude #6 Gemini #10 |
| 7 | | ±2.6 | ▲ 7 | 38% | 4.6 | 7% | ChatGPT #5 Claude #7 Gemini #12 |
| 8 | | ±3.3 | flat | 24% | 3.3 | 3% | ChatGPT #13 Claude #9 Gemini #4 |
| 9 | | ±5.1 | flat | 25% | 4.5 | 1% | ChatGPT #8 Claude #13 Gemini #7 |
| 10 | | ±4.8 | flat | 19% | 3.5 | 1% | ChatGPT #11 Claude #5 Gemini #13 |
| 11 | | ±1 | ▼ 2 | 18% | 3.9 | 3% | ChatGPT #10 Claude #11 Gemini #11 |
| 12 | | ±3.3 | flat | 22% | 5.3 | 0% | ChatGPT #12 Claude #12 Gemini #9 |
| 13 | | ±3.7 | ▲ 7 | 15% | 5.6 | 0% | ChatGPT #9 Claude Gemini #8 |
| 14 | | ±1.5 | ▼ 2 | 11% | 4.4 | 0% | ChatGPT Claude #10 Gemini |
| 15 | | ±4.3 | flat | 10% | 4.1 | 0% | ChatGPT #14 Claude #14 Gemini #14 |
The ± under each score is the reliability band: how much the number would move if we re-ran the identical measurement. It is tight because each prompt is sampled multiple times. It is not the same as how much the ranking depends on which prompts we ask — a separate, wider figure shown on hover.
Just below the cutoff: Canvas (6.7), Trainual (6.5), Udemy Business (6.1), Coursera (5.7), iSpring Learn (5.4). 67 brands were scored in this category; the leaderboard shows the top 15.
Visibility Score: position-weighted presence across all measured answers, 0 to 100. A score of 100 means the brand was the first recommendation in every answer. Every point in a trend line is a live monthly measurement; there is no modeled or backfilled history. Full methodology.
Openness 41/100: the share of this category's recommendation weight not held by the leader.
Compare brands in Corporate Learning (LMS) head-to-head → · Explore the prompt tree →
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Corporate Learning (LMS): the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Per-model Visibility Scores for the top 10. A long gray bar means the three assistants disagree about the brand. Hover a row for exact values.
When a brand is mentioned, where does it appear? Box shows the middle 50% of positions, the thick line is the median, whiskers are the extremes. Hover a row for the detail.
gpt-5.4
claude-sonnet-4-6
gemini-3-flash-preview
Each model answered every prompt 3 times in September 2026. Prompts are brand-neutral so no vendor gets seeded into the question.