When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about ai app builders, Cursor ranks #4 of 15, a Visibility Score of 44 in AI App Builders .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Mid-pack presence, strong on trends, absent from enterprise conversations.
Where it wins. Cursor earns a mention in 56% of AI app builder queries, and its co-mention pattern alongside Replit and Bolt signals it owns the prosumer tier of that conversation. The 'Top tools in 2026' prompt theme is where it consistently shows up, meaning broad awareness queries are working.
Where it loses. A 24% first-pick rate against a 56% mention rate means the AIs often name Cursor but hand the recommendation to someone else. Its complete absence from enterprise pick themes leaves a ceiling on deal size and buyer seriousness.
AI-generated analysis of the July 2026 measurements.
Cursor claims AI App Builders and the models back it: #4 of 15 there.
Homepage self-messaging · July 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →
One of the index's bigger model splits: see where the models disagree →
Share of each theme's answers that mention Cursor. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Enterprise pick
Share of Cursor's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in AI App Builders: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.