Thunderdome B2B SaaS AI Visibility Index

← AI App Builders ranking

Brand report · September 2026

Bubble Bubble: AI Visibility Report

bubble.io ↗

When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about ai app builders, Bubble ranks #6 of 15, a Visibility Score of 31 in AI App Builders (and appears in 2 categories of the index).

These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.

How AI sees Bubble

Present across two categories, dominant in neither.

Where it wins. In AI App Builders, Bubble reaches a 39% mention rate and converts to first pick 18% of the time, placing it solidly mid-tier among tools buyers actually consider for that use case.

Where it loses. In No-Code and Internal Tool Builders, a score of 10.3 and a first-pick rate of 1.4% signal that the AI models treat Bubble as a budget fallback rather than a genuine recommendation, and it is missing from six of the most purchase-driving prompt themes in that category.

AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.

On message

How Bubble positions itself vs how AI ranks it

Bubble claims AI App Builders and the models back it: #6 of 15 there.

The pitch

"Build with AI when you want speed, edit visually when you want precision"

Positions in AI App Builders
What AI actually says
In AI App Builders #6 of 15, claim holds

Homepage self-messaging · September 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →

How well the models know Bubble

A different question from visibility: not “do the models recommend Bubble?” but “asked about it directly, how specifically and confidently do they describe it?” High knowledge with low cross-model agreement is a warning sign — one model may be confidently filling gaps.

88 / 100
knowledge depth
models ranged 82–92
92 / 100
cross-model agreement
do the models describe the same product?
ChatGPT
90
Claude
82
Gemini
92

from 6 direct-question answers across ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini

AI App Builders · #6 of 15

31 / 100 flat vs last month
39%
mention rate (72 answers)
3
avg. position
18%
first pick
5%
share of voice
28.5Jul 2026Jul 2026: 28.531.7Aug 2026Aug 2026: 31.731.1Sep 2026Sep 2026: 31.1
ChatGPT
39
Claude
30
Gemini
25

How the models portray Bubble

Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).

54% 39%
endorsed · 95% band 36–70% listed caveated graded across 28 mentions in AI App Builders answers
Prompt themes Bubble would want to own

Share of each theme's answers that mention Bubble. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.

Best overall
9/9 · #1×6
Startup & small team
9/9 · #1×7

Gaps Enterprise pick

Most co-mentioned competitors

Share of Bubble's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.

Lovable
89%
Replit
61%
Bolt
61%
Glide
57%
Softr
54%
Cursor
43%

Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.

Get alerted on big movements

We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in AI App Builders: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

Or watch specific brands:

Work at Bubble? Put this on your site: a live "AI-recommended" badge, grounded in this data, that updates monthly and links back here. Free. Get the badge →