← Technical Interviewing & Assessment ranking
Brand report · September 2026When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about technical interviewing & assessment, CodeSubmit ranks #11 of 15, a Visibility Score of 4 in Technical Interviewing & Assessment .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
One category, bottom half, no path to first call.
Where it wins. CodeSubmit holds a slot in Technical Interviewing and Assessment conversations, appearing in 5.6% of relevant prompts. Its clearest foothold is with startup and small-team queries, where it earns enough mentions to crack the top 10 of 15 ranked tools.
Where it loses. A 2.8% first-pick rate in its only category means buyers hear the name but reach past it toward something else. Six prompt themes, including best overall and enterprise pick, return no CodeSubmit result at all, so the model's shortlist for higher-stakes hiring decisions is built without it.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention CodeSubmit. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Best overall · Use-case fit · Enterprise pick · Feature-led ask · If you could pick one · Budget & alternatives
Share of CodeSubmit's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Technical Interviewing & Assessment: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.