← Technical Interviewing & Assessment ranking
Brand report · September 2026When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about technical interviewing & assessment, Codility ranks #4 of 15, a Visibility Score of 32 in Technical Interviewing & Assessment .
These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.
Codility holds a single ring and sits fourth in it.
Where it wins. A 42% mention rate in Technical Interviewing and Assessment is real mass, meaning the models surface Codility in nearly half of relevant buyer queries. That earns it a legitimate seat at the category table alongside HackerRank and CoderPad.
Where it loses. Zero first-pick selections is the hard ceiling: when an AI commits to one name, Codility is not it. The absence from feature-specific and head-to-head prompts suggests the models treat it as a list filler rather than a conviction buy.
AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.
Codility claims Technical Interviewing & Assessment and the models back it: #4 of 15 there.
"AI can write code now. Hire the engineers who can build"
Homepage self-messaging · September 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →
Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).
Share of each theme's answers that mention Codility. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.
Gaps Feature-led ask · If you could pick one
Share of Codility's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.
Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.
We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in Technical Interviewing & Assessment: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.