Thunderdome B2B SaaS AI Visibility Index

← No-Code & Internal Tool Builders ranking

Brand report · September 2026

ToolJet ToolJet: AI Visibility Report

tooljet.com ↗

When buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini about no-code & internal tool builders, ToolJet ranks #4 of 15, a Visibility Score of 32 in No-Code & Internal Tool Builders .

These rankings are measured from what the three models know from training, not a live web search. The live-web grounded surface is rolling out across the index. Methodology.

How AI sees ToolJet

One arena, midfield, and zero first-pick wins.

Where it wins. ToolJet earns a 47% mention rate in No-Code and Internal Tool Builders, putting it in front of buyers nearly half the time AI fields that question. A rank of 4 out of 15 tools keeps it solidly in the conversation.

Where it loses. The first-pick rate sits at 0%, meaning AI models reach for Retool or Appsmith when recommending one tool above all others. ToolJet also disappears entirely when buyers frame the question around budget or alternatives, cutting it out of a natural entry point for cost-conscious evaluators.

AI-generated analysis of the September 2026 measurements.

Gap

How Tooljet positions itself vs how AI ranks it

Tooljet's homepage sells it as AI App Builders. Ask the models that question and they name Replit, Lovable and Bolt, not Tooljet.

The pitch

"From prompt to production with an all-in-one AI-powered app builder, automation agents, database, and integrations."

Positions in AI App Builders
Targets Enterprise
What AI actually says
In AI App Builders Not named. Replit, Lovable and Bolt lead

Why, and what closes it. Models recommend what the web says about a brand, not what its homepage asserts. That is a content and coverage gap, not a product one. Earned mentions and clearer positioning can move it.

Homepage self-messaging · September 2026 ranking · the biggest gaps across the index →

How well the models know ToolJet

A different question from visibility: not “do the models recommend ToolJet?” but “asked about it directly, how specifically and confidently do they describe it?” High knowledge with low cross-model agreement is a warning sign — one model may be confidently filling gaps.

82 / 100
knowledge depth
models ranged 72–88
92 / 100
cross-model agreement
do the models describe the same product?
ChatGPT
85
Claude
75
Gemini
85

from 6 direct-question answers across ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini

No-Code & Internal Tool Builders · #4 of 15

32 / 100 flat vs last month
47%
mention rate (72 answers)
4
avg. position
0%
first pick
7%
share of voice
27.4Jul 2026Jul 2026: 27.428.1Aug 2026Aug 2026: 28.132.4Sep 2026Sep 2026: 32.4
ChatGPT
41
Claude
53
Gemini
3

One of the index's bigger model splits: see where the models disagree →

How the models portray ToolJet

Being named is not the same as being recommended. Each mention is graded endorsed (a strong pick), listed (a neutral option), or caveated (named with a reservation).

21% 59% 21%
endorsed · 95% band 10–37% listed caveated graded across 34 mentions in No-Code & Internal Tool Builders answers
Prompt themes ToolJet would want to own

Share of each theme's answers that mention ToolJet. Hover a row for the exact prompt. Compare shapes on the head-to-head page.

Gaps Budget & alternatives

Most co-mentioned competitors

Share of ToolJet's mentions where the AI models name this brand in the same answer. That is the real competitive set in the AI channel.

Retool
100%
Appsmith
100%
Budibase
71%
Microsoft Power Apps
24%
OutSystems
21%
Mendix
21%

Scores are measured from real AI answers, refreshed monthly. Methodology.

Get alerted on big movements

We rerun the index every month. Drop your email and pick what to watch in No-Code & Internal Tool Builders: the whole category or specific brands. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

Or watch specific brands:

Work at ToolJet? Put this on your site: a live "AI-recommended" badge, grounded in this data, that updates monthly and links back here. Free. Get the badge →